W

WHY TELANGANA?

Formation of Telangana is impossible. I am born and raised in Hyderabad so I consider myself a Telangana by all means. Off course some still say I am an Andhra since my ancestors are from Guntur District. When I say this a lot of my Telangana friends get angry with me. Since I live in USA where freedom of speech is still practiced and followed in ToTo unlike in India so I am daring to write these few lines. But still my friends consider me as fool or a day dreamer. For them formation of Telangana is almost as true as tomorrow’s sunrise. They feel if not now in 2014 when BJP gets into power creation of Telangana is certain. I've got multi folded argument in support of my assertion. Let me analyze now.

1. LEGAL ISSUES INVOLVED.
Before 1956 there was no state which is now called as Andhra Pradesh. The current Andhra Pradesh was formed in view of recommendations made by Justice Fazal Ali commission which popularly known as States Reorganization Committee. The criterion for formation of Andhra Pradesh was that people talking Telugu who were residing in different parts of the country be brought under one Umbrella like other linguistic groups. So by virtue of this two independent resolutions were passed by the then states of Hyderabad and Andhra (which was separated from Madras Presidency in 1953). The resolutions passed by these assemblies are like almost unanimous. In the Hyderabad state assembly only 3 members opposed the merger. Somebody may correct me if I am wrong. Thus came into existence the state of Andhra Pradesh. So in view of these circumstances it is only assembly of State of Andhra Pradesh has got powers to divide the state into 2 or more. Definitely Parliament of India has to got no powers in this matter. The supporters of Telangana argue that in view of a bill of parliament only states of Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh and Uttaranchal (now Uttarakand) are formed so what's wrong in Parliament passing such a bill for formation of Telangana. Here I want to make a point clear to all those Telangana protagonists that creation of those states is totally a different scenario. For example in Bihar at that time Lalu Prasad Yadav was not in a position of forming a government without the help of JMM party headed by Shibhu Soren. Shibu Soren put a condition that his party JMM will support Lalu only if the later agrees to creation of Jharkhand state. Even Lalu thought that if Jharkhand region is deducted from Bihar he is the king in the rest of Bihar state. It was like a Win WIN situation for both. A similar situation was there in Chhattisgarh and Uttaranchal. The situation in AP is totally different. As I stated supra the state of Andhra Pradesh came into existence due to the resolutions of two independent state assemblies. So nothing can happen without a resolution by the assembly of AP. The Telangana protagonists should understand that let what may come Congress party will never introduce such bill in the parliament because it will face a stiff opposition from its own partners. The union government is headed by UPA and Congress party is only a big group of that coalition. In the present world where ever Westminster democracy is followed only coalition governments are existing including India. In the near future I don't see any single party is going get absolute majority including BJP and Congress. Even in 2014 also we are going to get only coalition government. It may be NDA headed by BJP or UPA one more time headed by Congress. So even if BJP headed by NDA government comes to power in 2014 still Telangana remains a dream. Already a major partner of NDA, the JD (U) which leads a coalition government in Bihar feels creation of Jharkhand is a big mistake. There are so many other partners of NDA who oppose division of states further. They fear of such more demands in their home states. Why in 2014 by virtue of a magic say NDA headed by BJP is in power at center tomorrow I challenge that still the BJP cannot introduce a bill in Parliament for creation of Telangana. All the BJP stalwarts like LK Advani, Nitin Gadkari and Venkayya Naidu know this fact. What BJP is currently doing is fishing in troubled waters so that in 2014 elections it can get some seats in Telangana region. But it will remains a big dream for them. BJP didn't learned any lesson from 1999 elections when they went to polls in AP with an election slogan “one vote two states”. Off course people in Andhra and Rayalaseema regions rejected BJP in Toto. Even in Telangana people rejected BJP. Though I am big supporter of BJP still I condemn BJP the way it is dealing this issue. I blame TDP President Chandra Babu Naidu totally for the current situation in Andhra Pradesh. The Government of India headed by Congress party time and again was asking for a consensus among all parties of Andhra Pradesh on this issue. Though most of the sunny bunny parties were in favor of Telangana but it was more particular about of the view of the major and main opposition party Telugu Desam headed by Chandra Babu Naidu. When Chandra Babu Naidu supported the Telangana by signing the resolution the union government came up with the December 9th 2009 statement by Chidambaram. Though the timing was wrong but still the union government had do it taking in view of the delicate situation of KCR hunger strike though it is a fake one. Even in that statement by Chidambaram also the Union Government behaved with care and responsibility. Please note the words in that statement. It was like this “The steps for creation of state of Telangana will be taken by introducing a bill in the AP assembly" The Union government was under the impression that every single soul and political party in Andhra Pradesh is in favor of creation of Telangana. The Union government thought that if the state assembly passes a resolution for division state then what the problem is. Even if such separate demands come from other regions still they could go by the standard set like a resolution by the concerned state assembly. But entire situation was reversed when there was a big agitation from the people living Andhra and Rayalaseema regions. The union government realized its mistake and came up with the December23rd 2009 statement. The Bill in parliament is just an eye wash. Introduction of a bill by Congress for creation of Telangana is just impossible and even if it is coined most of its partners will vote against it. Even BJP will vote against it saying their politburo is against any bill introduced by Congress party. Just for imagination even if all the parties support this bill it can’t stand the test of law. Somebody will challenge this bill in Supreme Court. If nobody does still I will do it. I am still an Indian citizen. I strongly feel Supreme Court will definitely rule in my favor saying that without a resolution by the assembly of Andhra Pradesh the Indian Parliament can’t act on its own. While dismissing a batch of writ petitions filed earlier in this connection, the Supreme Court observed that they were immature and has got no cause of action. The Supreme Court also pointed out it will consider again when any such resolution or bill passed by Union Government in this connection. So bottom line is without a resolution by the assembly of the state of Andhra Pradesh nothing can happen. It is not out of place to mention that none of parties including TRS is working in this direction. Honestly none of the politicians who are raising their voice in favor of creation of Telangana state are serious in this direction including the so called champion of Telangana cause Mr. KCR. I don’t want to repeat under what circumstances KCR started Telangana agitation. It may not be a shock one fine morning KCR takes up a plum post and dump this so called Telangana agitation like the way his predecessor of Telangana cause Mr. Marri Chenna Reddy did.

2. SOCIAL ISSUES.
A lot of people of Telangana still think and under the impression that people from Andhra region migrated in big numbers to Telangana only after formation of AP state in 1956. It is totally a wrong conception. When Nizamsagar dam was constructed in 1923 by the then rulers of the erstwhile Hyderabad State, Mir Osman Ali Khan his dream was to cultivate thousands of acres of land. I don’t want to use the word lazy but due to ill knowledge of the Hyderabad state farmers he personally invited the farmers of Andhra region to come to Hyderabad state and cultivate those lands as well as educate the farmers of Hyderabad state about the tricks in the cultivation and irrigation of lands making use of dam waters. Thus several thousands of farmers from Andhra region came to then Hyderabad state popularly known as Nizam state. The KCR and his gang calling them as settlers who came to Telangana to rob the wealth of the Telangana. The truth is that those so called settlers converted if not millions at least thousands of acres of barren land into rich fertile lands which can produce at least 2 crops a year. The result today the lands under ayacut of Nizam Sagar and other places produce the best agricultural produce whether it is Rice, Sugarcane or Bajra. This happened because of relentless and untiring efforts of those farmers who migrated to Telangana region from Andhra. Now the intention is by hook or crook the politicians like Chenna Reddy then and KCR now to grab those rich fertile lands. The same is the case with Hyderabad city and suburbs. It is a joint effort by several thousands of people both from Andhra and Telangana region making Hyderabad this big and successful. That’s why the slogan Andhra Go Back came. In 1969 the first word came from the mouth of Chenna Reddy was Andhra Go Back. I was a kid then but still Chenna Reddy had no answer when I asked him in an open meeting where the Andhra should go back and why? Now one more time I ask KCR who day in and day out screams at the pitch of his voice that Andhra Wale Bagho. Where Andhrawale should bagho and why? The lands in possession by the people whose ancestors are from Andhra region are bought by paying a valid consideration and registered in their favor by the Government of Andhra Pradesh. Creation of a state or division of a state is purely a legislative affair subject to approval by the Judiciary. Let KCR convince the state legislators for division of state the so called setters will not have any objection because till that happens they are called citizen of Andhra Pradesh and after that citizen of Telangana or any other name the state is called. Still their rights to those lands are protected by the Constitution of India. If Government of India fails to protect their rights, then United Nations Organization (UNO) comes into picture for violation of human rights. A lot of my friends and many protagonists of Telangana that the merger of Hyderabad State with Andhra state was forced wedding. Everybody keep in their mind there was never a state or region which was called Telangana which was merged with Andhra state which was called a forceful wedding. And now Telangana wants a divorce or judicial separation. This argument was coined by lawyers belonging to Telangana. Looks like that those Telangana lawyers have not read entire matrimonial law in its true sprits. In the entire world no democratic country has a law where divorce will be granted just it is asked by one partner to the wedding. Even in the western world also divorce is granted only when both partners to the wedding decided to call it a day. If one party to the wedding says no then no court or force on this planet can separate them unless the party asking for divorce proves beyond reasonable doubt that other party was cruel, commited adultery or desertion etc., as grounds of divorce. If we apply the same yard stick here in this case one partner to the wedding clearly says no to the divorce. I don’t want to dwell into controversy here who is Husband and who is Wife. The Telangana people got a golden opportunity in 1972-73 when Andhra people themselves wanted a separation. But just because a Telangana man late P V Narasimha Rao was a Chief Minister at that time the Telangana people rejected that idea by saying that Andhra people are jealous of Telangana man at the helm of affairs. In every field it is always fittest is the survival especially in Politics. That’s the reason the same PV became a most successful Prime Minister of India in a very stiff opposite conditions. Every single Telugu is proud of PV who changed the course of the India towards development. Whatever the little development we see in India today is because of late PV Narasimha Rao. It is our bad luck he could not get a 2nd term to continue his efforts to take India to a different level. Any ways that was gone. It was always a prose for the politician who rake up Telangana card that this region was neglected, suppressed and oppressed and all possible words in dictionary. Mrs. Sonia Gandhi did one thing intelligently which Mrs. Indira Gandhi failed to do in 1970’s is that appointment of a judicial commission headed by Supreme Court Justice Sri Krishna. Thanks to Mrs. Sonia Gandhi. Justice Sri Krishna commission categorically dwelled into the issue and submitted its report. In the report Justice Sri Krishna specifically observed that though in some areas of Telangana area are still backward but overall Telangana region is far advanced than other regions of state like Rayalaseema, North Andhra and even the so-called advanced districts of Andhra region like Guntur, Krishna, East and West Godavari. By slip of the tongue even KCR admitted this fact several times. Since the claim and argument of backwardness/suppression etc. fell flat because of finding by Justice Sri Krishna committee the KCR gang took up a new slogan of self-respect by saying that people or legislators from Telangana were not given prime posts. We had 4 Chief Ministers from Telangana and even in the current cabinet several major portfolios are held by legislators from Telangana region. The most important ministry after Chief Minister is always headed by a legislator from Telangana. I am talking about Home Ministry. If we don’t get an opportunity to have person from our region at the helm of affairs doesn’t mean that our region is neglected, suppressed or insulted. If that happens really then the person to blame is the legislator/s from that constituency or region who did not raise their voice for their share of cake. Just for this reason we have no right to claim a separate state or country. Again I reiterate my stand that in any field fittest is the survival. The classic example is our current Prime Minister Dr Manmohan Singh who though born in Pakistan and raised in Punjab state is not even a member of Lok Sabha from any state. He is only a nominated member of Rajya Sabha from Assam quota. But still he is our Prime Minister for a second term. We the people of Andhra Pradesh including Telangana voted for him.
So my dear Telangana brothers and sisters come on grew up and fight the world. Thank God India is a democratic country so grab the opportunity and grow. I pity those people who live in USA and enjoying plum positions still support this cause. They should understand they are in those positions just because they are able and fought the world to get it. So teach their brothers and sisters back home to fight the world in the right and correct way by achieving higher education and knowledge.
SARVE JANA SUKHINO BHAVANTHU.

Kiran Babu Mandava
Roanoke, VA 24012 USA

Land Acquisition Act and it’s misuse

In all these 65+ years of independence there is not even one law that was enacted for which our successive governments can be proud of it. All most every single central act is enacted by the erstwhile British Governments. Over the years our governments misused those laws which were meant for public benefit. One among those several laws is Land Acquisition Act of 1894. The sole intention of this law was to give power to the government to acquire a private property for the purposes of public benefit and use. The public purpose has been defined very clearly which reads like this under section 5(f) of the said act.
5*[(f) the expression "public purpose" includes-- (i) the provision of village-sites, or the extension, planned development or improvement of existing village-sites; (ii) the provision of land for town or rural planning; (iii) the provision of land for planned development of land from public funds in pursuance of any scheme or policy of Government and subsequent disposal thereof in whole or in part by lease, assignment or outright sale with the object of securing further development as planned; (iv) the provision of land for a corporation owned or controlled by the State; (v) the provision of land for residential purposes to the poor or landless or to persons residing in areas affected by natural calamities, or to persons displaced or affected by reason of the implementation of any scheme undertaken by Government, any local authority or a corporation owned or controlled by the State; (vi) the provision of land for carrying out any educational, housing, health or slum clearance scheme sponsored by Government or by any authority established by Government for carrying out any such scheme, or, with the prior approval of the appropriate Government, by a local authority, or a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860, or under any corresponding law for the time being in force in a State, or a co-operative society within the meaning of any law relating to co-operative societies for the time being in force in any State; (vii) the provision of land for any other scheme of development sponsored by Government, or, with the prior approval of the appropriate Government, by a local authority; (viii) the provision of any premises or building for locating a public office, but does not include acquisition of land for Companies;]
Nowhere in the definition is it mentioned that a private property whether it is rural or urban can be acquired for the purpose of commercialization or change the nature of it for commercial purposes. It is also specifically prohibited the acquisition of land for Companies. But over the years every single government by using state force acquiring rural agricultural lands which are under cultivation only to be handed over to Companies. These Companies get those lands for a throw away price and getting millions and millions of rupees as subsidies. Because state power the victims are helpless and suffer the losses. Once in a while a leader like Ms Mamata Banerjee raises the flag of revolt against the system and successful in getting back the land. The incidents like Nandigram do not happen all the time. Under the guise of SEZ’s a new trend is set by that any agricultural land can be acquired and converted to non agricultural purposes. The common settled laws speak that whenever any kind of wealth is discovered under the ground whether it may be a mine, hidden treasure it should be belong to the Government. The private individual has got no right to it. At the outset itself this law is bad. The British with the sole ill intention of grabbing the wealth of India enacted this law. Our governments gave a new twist to it. Whenever such wealth is discovered then it should go to the private companies. The real owners to that wealth will get nothing out of it. In the present day world oil or natural gas are real treasures hidden under the ground. If it is high seas then the Government of India can claim rights over the same and lease those rights to any private party. But definitely not on the ground especially when the said land belongs individual farmers. In the Krishna – Godavari Basin huge amounts natural gas is detected. The Government of Andhra Pradesh swung into action grabbed those agricultural lands forcibly from the poor farmers and handed over the same to a private enterprise the Reliance Group. The Governments of AP, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, UP and many more governments have acquired agricultural lands from poor farmers only to be handed over to the companies like Wipro, Infosys, and TCS just to name few at throw away prices. All this is done in the name industrial development. We don’t want industrial development at the cost of agriculture.

A P State should not be divided at the present juncture and it should never.

A P State should not be divided at the present juncture and it should never.
Let me cite reasons for this.
Reason 01 - State should not be divided at the present juncture.
• Backwardness is not a valid reason for dividing the state. It happens due to failure of local leadership to take care of the interests of their constituents.
• There are backward areas in all the three regions and for that reason all over the country. Backwardness in Telangana if at all it is there is caused by bad governance and failure on the part of the rulers to decentralize investments and political leadership from region. Due to shortsightedness of political leadership, Central and state governments invested in Hyderabad heavily and it attracted private investments not only from all the districts of AP but from other states too. It is not out of place to mention that in fact Telangana developed a lot in these 54 years. In 1956 there was just one University (Osmania) now there are several existing giving opportunity to the students who wants study and flourish. But the people who don’t want to utilize the facilities and elect to be remained backward not just a separate state even God also can’t help them. With enormous development in and around, Hyderabad became a bone of contention between provinces. The development of Hyderabad is done by taxes paid by the entire state not just from Telangana region. The Telangana leaders on the false pretext of backwardness wanted to grab the entire fruit for themselves depriving the others. This is neither justified nor ethical. The same thing happened in the case of Bombay. The Central Government invested heavily in Bombay utilizing the taxes paid by the entire country. People migrate to such places where they feel can make living. People from other parts of the AP migrated to Hyderabad heavily because of opportunities created utilizing the taxes paid by the entire state. TRS in AP and Shiva Sena in Bombay are no different. They both want to swallow the development done by the country put together. This kind of outfits are dangerous to the country.
• Self-centered politicians, their conniving counterparts aided by indifferent successive central governments should be blamed for non-honoring of agreements and common man should not penalized for the same.
• Several half-truths and untruths have been in circulation and passions have been whipped up in students and certain sections of employees regarding injustices meted out to Telangana. Bifurcation at this hour leaves scars of separation and history may repeat what happened when India was divided on the lines of religion on August 14th 1947. I strongly feel and fear that the anti social elements take charge and incite a kind of civil war between the people leading to heavy bloodbath.
Reason 02 – Division of state is not needed at all.
• Telugus share a common heritage, language and culture for ages. They have been together barring 156 yrs. (1800-1956). From the beginning of 20th century, many families from Coastal and Seema areas migrated to Telangana region for better opportunities and employment. During police action in 1948 by Sardar Vallabhai Patel lead to the Razaakar movement by the Muslim fundamentalist Kasim Razvi which was sponsored by the then Nizam against Hindus of Hyderabad state made several thousands of Hindus from the Telangana region flee to Andhra Region for fear of life. That apart thousands lost their lives. Those Telugus were adopted by the Andhra region people with open heart and are still living there happily.
• Formation of AP has accelerated the process of migration to Hyderabad and now it is very difficult to define who is ‘native’ Telangana and who is not. Many families from ‘Andhra’ region technically come under definition of ‘Telangana’. Intermingling among Telugus of all the regions is so deep that it becomes a complicate exercise to divide them on nativity issue. There are several cases where members of same family come under different categories.
• It is an ideal situation to stay put together. Division of AP or any state should not be divided on the lines region, backwardness. Management of a state depends upon the leadership not the size. Size never matters. Just because it is small it is manageable is just absurd. If really division of AP into small parts is good for administration then the whole country should be divided into small states but definitely not on the basis of region nor culture. Then it should be done on the basis of late General Kariappa’s plan which was kindled by the Nehru and all politicians at that time. The Indian culture at large is one then why states at all?
Reason 03 – India was never united thanks to British who gave us the concept of India.
• From the ages and time immemorial India was never united. India is a sub continent having several thousands of small tiny kingdoms and that was the main reason for invasion of Bharat by Moghuls and all those Muslim invaders. It’s the British who conceived the concept of a united country called India and gave us recognition in the world. If the AP is divided now then several demands for more and more states will arise. There are already demands for states like Vidharba, Gorkhaland, Southern Tamil Nadu, Western UP are already there in the wings. Trust me India will be divided into several pieces dating back to several centuries. Please don’t let that happen again to our Motherland.
• Waterways is going to be the main means of fuel-saving transport in coming years and if the state is divided heeding to the agitations by selfish, un-employed politicians then all waterways will become battlegrounds. States start fighting over the rights of waterways.
• Since Telangana region remained under feudal rule of Nizam, they were deprived of several benefits enjoyed by their counterparts under British rule. After formation of Andhra Pradesh, the common man in Telangana learnt fast in the company of Coastal and Seema Telugus and registered phenomenal growth. Young leadership coming up from hitherto downtrodden sections in Telangana is going to replace feudalistic old guard soon and division on provincial lines would hinder the process.
• If any agreement is going to be signed by leaders from different provinces, let there be a mechanism by Central government to oversee implementation of the same. Let the government stop investing in Hyderabad on any project whether it is Metro Railway or an IIT but distribute the same all over the state for uniform, sustained growth.
• Your committee is the only ray of hope to lead us to enlightenment. We hope your findings will be an eye-opener on backwardness of any region in the country. You seem to be the only setup who is addressing the T-issue in right earnest and hence this appeal.
Reason 04. Joint Family and a State are totally 2 different things can’t be confused.
• There is strong argument in the air saying when the family grows brothers divide and make separate families. So do the State should be divided. This argument is just stupid. A joint family to separate all that needed is division of assets by metes and bounds. But separation of state needs much more than that. When a state is divided you need more new Capitals, High Courts, Secretariats, Assembly Halls and an unending list of buildings to house government houses. The only people who are benefitted when a state is divided are the politicians. New Minister posts, MLA’s, MLC’s, Corporation Chairmen etc., From where the money comes for these luxuries? Spending on these luxuries when common is struggling hard for two square meals a day is not waste but it is a criminal waste.
Reason 05. Why force us to stay united?
• There is one more argument strongly coined by the politicians who are supporting the division of state there by paving way for formation of Telangana state saying when we want to get separated why force us to stay united. They are equating the situation to a silly proposition by terming the Andhra and Telangana regions as Husband & Wife relationship. Who is Husband and who is Wife nobody clarified till now but strongly arguing that they want to get separated since our mind sets does not match so separate us? But they are forgetting one most important equation that is among the spouses if one is against separation no court can divide them unless some serious allegations like cruelty, adultery or desertion is proved beyond reasonable doubt. Till this day nothing of this sort happened. No forum has ever inquired nor collected data as to really who cheated on the other or who behaved cruelly or who deserted who? More over division of a state is not like nullifying a marriage it affects millions of peoples’ lives for generations to come.

Separate states never solved problems of the general public. They were always created to solve the problems of the politicians. On the other hand they aggravated the people’s problems. Before the formation of Andhra state on linguistic basis the Telugu people were happy and prosperous in the erstwhile Madras state. Now the same Telugu people in Tamil Nadu are second class citizens, the Telugu language and culture literally crushed by the successive arrogant and fanatic Tamil governments. The same is the case with the people on this side of line. Even today people struggle hard for 2 square meals a day and no access to clean drinking water. The people of Telangana were happy in the erstwhile Nizam state though Telugu language and culture was crushed by the then rulers. When people wanted stay like that they should left them like. Why force them to join a new state again based on the linguistic basis? The then politicians who styled themselves as Gentlemen created an agreement and forced the Telangana people to join the new Andhra Pradesh. When two independent and separate regions joined into one composite state on linguistic basis then why the name of the new state should sound like one region. The word Andhra irritates the people of Telangana then why the state is named as Andhra Pradesh? It could have been Telugu Nadu, Telugu Desham, Telugu Rashtram or something like other linguistic states. Nobody cared or bothered the feelings of the people then or bothering now. The scandalous politicians want only power and for that they go to any extent in dividing the people. If a Governor ship or central ministry is offered now KCR will accept that and one more time people will become laughing స్టాక్.

YSR THE RISE AND THE FALL

Greetings. My following thoughts sound stupid and baseless but still I wanted to share them with my friends

I am staunch believer of God. I feel every thing that happens in thisworld is because God wants it to happen that way. According to Hindu mythology and philosophy Sri Mahavishnu is the creator and real God. He sends his avatars to planet earth incorporating him. In that order
Sri Venkateshwara Swami is the latest avatar and after him no avatarhas come to date. Lord Balaji is considered and worshipped by his millions of bhakts like me as the Kaliyuga Daivam. Every body who visits Tirumala even those few seconds when you're there in the temple
our soul gets connected to the Lord and you get a unique, divine feeling of satisfaction. That's the reason numbers who visit Tirumala increasing multi fold every day even though the facilities on Tirumalaare very scanty.

In 2004 YSR became CM of the state and thus became de-facto VVIP and Chief Administrator of the temple. Being a hard core third generation Christian he should have kept himself away from the affairs of the TTD. But using his power he spoiled the sanctity of Tirumala by
allowing structures belonging to other religious beliefs especially Christianity and also allowed preachers to preach Christianity on Tirumala. For christians like YSR Lord Venkateshwara Swamy is only life size statue made in Black granite. Nothing more that. Though the believers of the Swami felt bad and hurt they could not do anything because of fear of political power of YSR. Lord Balaji kept quiet thinking that in 2009 people will teach him a lesson by electing any other person who has belief in Swami. But people chose YSR for a second term. After tasting power for a full term and got elected for a 2nd term YSR became very proud, rude and ruthless
a dictator. A whole lot of journalists and thinker rightly said at that moment if YSR wins for a 2nd term will be a dictator. He started his unfinished task of destroying the sanctity of Tirmala totally. So he brought in all the corrupt officials who will obey his orders with out any questions into TTD and result is all those politics in the TTD affairs,misuse of temple funds to promote things other than temple development etc., and tip of all those is the missing jewelry of Swami. My sixth sense was saying to me that Lord will definitely punish this guy, he
will not finish his term and will die in power. But I never expected this thing to happen so soon. Whatever people say Lord Balaji punished him. He ignored all the warnings regarding bad weather and chose to fly just to meet his end in ghastly manner like getting his body
burned beyond recognition.

Now all those power mongers and chamchas of YSR are projecting Jagan as successor to YSR so that they can save their plum posts and loot the public money more&more. But personally I feel and my sixth sense again saying that AP heading fast towards a coalition government headed
by Chandra Babu Naidu. I've got no reasoning for this but I feel Chiru is going to join the coalition by taking some plum posts and some congresswalahs who never got any power will cross over. I am not talking about the hard core congresswalahs like Rosiah, Kesava Rao or
Hanumantha Rao but there are so many MLA's who are not happy with YSR who kept them selves in low key fearing the political power of YSR. Since the strength of INC is just 10 above the magic mark CBN knows how to tap those resources and break the Congress. Good Luck
to CBN and all those likeminded.